🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about industry interference with public health regulations. In recent weeks, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “according to global suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than one year after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities actually suggests a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for different infractions “varying from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

In the letter, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia states the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its operations according with relevant national regulations. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, noting that young individuals should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to accomplish desired population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which includes increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.