🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning average wages must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare that with what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many our government's defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would remain a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.